Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 11/07/2022
Online Published: 11/07/2022
Abstract Views: 60
Views PDF: 95
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.12.336.2013
Issue
No. 12 (2013)
Section
Scientific research
How to Cite
Nguyen, T. C. T., Ta, T. V. A., Nguyen, T. B., & Mai, V. N. (2022). Planning impt treatment by using cerr program. Vietnamese Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 12, 571-576. https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.12.336.2013

Planning impt treatment by using cerr program

Nguyen Thi Cam Thu1, Ta Thi Van Anh1, Nguyen Thai Binh2, Mai Van Nhon1,
1 University of Natural Sciences, City. Ho Chi Minh
2 Prowess Inc, Concord, USA

Main Article Content

Abstract

SUMMARY
Up to now, beside two conventional methods are using electron beam and photon beam, radiotherapy using high energy proton beam has been attracted more and more scientists and hospitals. In this work, we using CERR program to make a treatment planning. The simulation results show that the treatment plan is better compared with by photon beam. The risk organs surrounding the tumour received negligible low dose. So the side effect decreases
significantly. We also make a comparison the treatment planning by proton beam with by photon beam.

Article Details

Keywords

cancer, treatment planning, high energy proton beam therapy

References

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. A. I. Papash et al, “Commercial accelerators: Compact super conducting synchrocyclotrons with magnetic field up to 10 T for proton and carbon therapy”, Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters, Volume 9, Issue 6-7, pp 517-529, November 2012.
2. Alfred R. Smith, “Vision 20/20: proton therapy”, Medical Physics 36, pp 556-568, 2009.
3. A. Lomax, “Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy,”Phys.Med. Biol.44, pp 185–205, 1999.
4. Basit S. Athar, Harald Paganetti, “Comparison of second cancer risk due to out-of-field doses from 6-MV IMRT and proton therapy based on 6 pediatric patient
treatment plans”, Radiotherapy and Oncology 98,pp 87-92, 2011.
5. Ezzell, G., “Genetic and geometric optimization of three-dimensional ra-diation therapy treatment planning”, Med Phys 23(3), pp 293-305, 1996.
6. ICRU Report 78, Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Proton-Beam Therapy, Journal of the ICRU, Oxford University Press, Vol. 7 No 2, 2007.
7. J.N.A. Matthews: “Accelerators shrink to meet growing demand for proton therapy”, Physics Today, p.
22, March 2009.
8. J. O. Deasy, A. I. Blanco, and V. H. Clark, “CERR: A computational environment for radiotherapy research,” Med. Phys. 30, pp 979–985, 2003.
9. Lee, M., Nahum, A. E., and Webb, S., An empirical method to build up a model of proton dose distribution for a radiotherapy treatment planning package, Phys. Med. Biol., 38, pp 989–998, 1993.
10. Linda Hong et al, A pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations, Phys. Med. Biol. 41, pp 1305– 1330, 1996.