The clinical, biochemical test and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in patients with acth-dependent Cushing's syndrome

Anh Trung Đỗ Lê1,, Dr Vu Dang Luu2, Dr Tran Anh Tuan3, Nguyen Quang Anh2, Lê Hoang Kien3, Nguyen Tat Thien3, Nguyen Cong Tien3
1 Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội
2 Hanoi Medical University
3 Dien Quang Center, Bach Mai Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To investigate pituitary images on MRI in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Subject and method: Cross-sectional descriptive study of 15 patients (12 women, 3 men) diagnosed with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome and underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland from October 2022 to October 2023. Results: Male/female ratio = 1/4. The verage age is 38.47 ± 10.78 (the age range from 27 to 62). All patients had plasma ACTH levels >10pg/ml which is consistent with the clinical diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Patients with pituitary adenomas observed on MRI account for 80%. The average tumor size is 4.59 ± 1.77mm, 100% of tumors are microadenoma at grade I, stage 0 according to the Hardy-Wilson classification. The group of tumors with isointense signals are highest on both T1W and T2W pulse sequences, at 83.34% and 58.33%, respectively. On the kinetic injection pulse sequence, all tumors appeared as poorly enhancing nodules. Conclusion: Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging is a good method in diagnosing and evaluating the invasion's level and stage of pituitary adenomas in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Assessing tumor morphology combined with kinetic injection pulse sequence is valuable in defining diagnosis, especially in cases which tumors are difficult to see on basic pulse sequences. However, there are several pituitary adenomas that are not observed on MRI, even when incorporating a dynamic drug injection pulse sequence. In these cases, invasive and specialized techniques such as bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) should be considered to quantify ACTH level.

Article Details

References

1. Wengander S, Trimpou P, Papakokkinou E, Ragnarsson O. The incidence of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome in the modern era. Clinical Endocrinology. 2019;91(2):263-270. doi:10.1111/cen.14014
2. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome. The Lancet. 2006;367(9522):16051617. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68699-6
3. Wilson CB. A decade of pituitary microsurgery: The Herbert Olivecrona Lecture. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1984;61(5):814-833. doi:10.3171/jns.1984.61.5.0814
4. Friedman TC, Yanovski JA. Morning plasma free cortisol: Inability to distinguish patients with mild Cushing syndrome from patients with pseudo-Cushing states. J Endocrinol Invest. 1995;18(9):696-701. doi:10.1007/BF03349791
5. Nieman LK. Molecular Derangements and the Diagnosis of ACTH-Dependent Cushing’s Syndrome. Endocrine Reviews. 2022;43(5):852-877. doi:10.1210/endrev/bnab046
6. Raff H, Carroll T. Cushing’s syndrome: from physiological principles to diagnosis and clinical care. J Physiol. 2015;593(Pt 3):493-506. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.282871
7. Castinetti F, Morange I, Conte-Devolx B, Brue T. Cushing’s disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:41. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-7-41
8. Liu Z, Zhang X, Wang Z, et al. High positive predictive value of the combined pituitary dynamic enhanced MRI and high-dose dexamethasone suppression tests in the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease bypassing bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14694. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71628-0
9. Shi X, Sun Q, Bian L, et al. Assessment of Bilateral Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of the ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome: A comparison with other tests. 2011.
10. Purwar N, Kumar A, Sharma B, et al. Bilateral Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling in Corticotropin-Dependent Cushing’s Syndrome: A Single Center Experience from Western India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;24(4):343348. doi:10.4103/ijem.IJEM_247_20
11. Tsukamoto T, Miki Y. Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications—part 1. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma. Jpn J Radiol. 2023;41(8):789-806. doi:10.1007/s11604-023-01400-7
12. Scheithauer BW, Kovacs KT, Laws ER, Randall RV. Pathology of invasive pituitary tumors with special reference to functional classification. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1986;65(6):733-744. doi:10.3171/jns.1986.65.6.0733