Value of multi-series computed tomography in diagnosing peritoneal tuberculosis in patients with exudative ascites

Ngọc Ánh Nguyễn1,, Pham Minh Thong2, Le Van Khang3, Nguyen Cong Tien3
1 Đại học Y Hà Nội
2 Hanoi Medical University
3 Radiology Center - Bach Mai Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Aim: Value of multi-series computed tomography in diagnosing peritoneal tuberculosis in patients with exudative ascites at Bach Mai Hospital.


Materials and methods:  A cross-sectional descriptive study on 111 patients, including 48 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of peritoneal tuberculosis and 63 patients with ascites secretions caused by non-peritoneal tuberculosis at Bach Mai hospital from January 1, 2022 to September 1, 2023. CT findings were evaluated for the presence of ascites, peritoneal thickening and nodular, omental thickening and enhancement, mesenteric thickening and nodules, and presence of lumph nodes.


Results: Among these 48 PTB patients, there were 17 females and 31 males giving a male- female ratio of 1.82:1. The most common clinical symptom was ascites with 60.4%. 100% of patients were exudative ascites, high lymphocytes with average ratio of lymphocyte was 61.0%, ADA of peritoneal fluid increased, average 39.6 UI/L. In the group of patients with non-tuberculous exudative ascites, there were 40 patients with peritoneal metastases, accounting for 63.5%, the remaining causes were pancreatitis, ascites infection, and malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Smooth peritoneal thickening, peritoneal micro nodules, lymph node necrosis and omental enhancement smudged pattern were seen more common in PTB (p<0.05). The sensitivity


and specificity of omental enhancement smudged pattern were 91% and 60%, accuracy was 0.74. Smooth peritoneal thickening, peritoneal micro nodules, lymph node necrosis had highly specificity ranging from 77-100% but low sensitivity (12.5% - 45%). Focal peritoneal thickening (or peritoneal thickening irregular) and omental enhancement cake like, nodular were seen more commonly in the group of patients with non-tuberculous exudative ascites, especially peritoneal metastases with 19/40 and 21/40 patients.


Conclusion: Although the characteristics of peritoneal lesions were mostly found in the two groups of patients with exudative ascites, smooth peritoneal thickening, peritoneal micro nodules, lymph node necrosis and omental enhancement smudged pattern suggest PTB

Article Details

References

1. Sanai FM, Bzeizi KI. Systematic review: tuberculous peritonitis – presenting features, diagnostic strategies and treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(8):685-700. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02645.x
2. Cho JK, Choi YM, Lee SS, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of abdominal tuberculosis in southeastern Korea: 12 years of experience. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):699. doi:10.1186/s12879-018-3635-2
3. Na-ChiangMai W, Pojchamarnwiputh S, Lertprasertsuke N, Chitapanarux T. CT findings of tuberculous peritonitis. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(6):488-491.
4. Ramanan RV, Venu V. Differentiation of peritoneal tuberculosis from peritoneal carcinomatosis by the Omental Rim sign. A new sign on contrast enhanced multidetector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2019;113:124-134. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.019
5. Chen J, Liu S, Tang Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of CT for differentiating peritoneal tuberculosis from peritoneal carcinomatosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(5):396.e7-396.e14. doi:10.1016/j. crad.2019.12.014
6. Ha HK, Jung JI, Lee MS, et al. CT differentiation of tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(3):743-748. doi:10.2214/ajr.167.3.8751693
7. World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO). World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO). Accessed November 28, 2023. https://www.worldgastroenterology.org
8. Oriuchi N, Nakajima T, Mochiki E, et al. A New, Accurate and Conventional Five-point Method for Quantitative Evaluation of Ascites Using Plain Computed Tomography in Cancer Patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35(7):386390. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyi109
9. Lê Thị Kim Hoa (2003). Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng lao màng bụng ở người lớn có phẫu thuật và không phẫu thuật. Luận văn thạc sỹ y học. Đại học Y Hà Nội
10. Awasthi S, Saxena M, Ahmad F, Kumar A, Dutta S. Abdominal Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Dilemma. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2015;9(5):EC01-EC03. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/13350.5887
11. Kharrat J, Gargouri D, Ouakaa A, et al. [Laparoscopic aspects of peritoneal tuberculosis. Report of 163 cases]. Tunis Med. 2003;81(8):558-562.
12. Nguyễn Minh Hiền(2020). Khảo sát giá trị Adenosin Deaminase dịch chọc dò trong chuẩn đoán lao màng bụng. Luận văn thạc sỹ y học. Đại học Y Hà Nội
13. Voigt MichaelD, Trey C, Lombard C, Kalvaria I, Berman P, Kirsch RalphE. Diagnostic value of ascites adenosine deaminase in tuberculous peritonitis. The Lancet. 1989;333(8641):751-754. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92574-9A
14. Charoensak A, Nantavithya P, Apisarnthanarak P. Abdominal CT findings to distinguish between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2012;95(11):1449-1456.
15. Phạm Sơn Nam(2020). Nghiên cứu giá trị của sinh thiết dưới hướng dẫn siêu âm trong chẩn đoán tổn thương mạc nối lớn. Luận văn thạc sỹ y học. Đại học Y Hà Nội
16. Naz F, Mirza WA, Hashmani N, Sayani R. To identify the features differentiating peritoneal tuberculosis from carcinomatosis on CT scan abdomen taking omental biopsy as a gold standard. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68(10):1461-1464.
17. Wang SB, Ji YH, Wu HB, et al. PET/CT for differentiating between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis: The parietal peritoneum. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(2):e5867. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000005867
18. Yin W jie, Zheng G qi, Chen Y feng, et al. CT differentiation of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma and tuberculous peritonitis. Radiol Med (Torino). 2016;121(4):253-260. doi:10.1007/s11547-015-0609-y
19. Rodríguez E, Pombo F. Peritoneal tuberculosis versus peritoneal carcinomatosis: distinction based on CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20(2):269-272. doi:10.1097/00004728-199603000-00018