Description of ultrasonic imaging characteristics of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis

Thị Nụ Đỗ1,, Nguyen Đinh Khoa2, Nguyen Thị Tuyen Tran3, Pham Thy Thien3, Tran Ngoc Huu Đuc2, Nguyen Thu Huong2, Nguyen Thi Tuyet Hang2, Bui Phu Quang2, Le Thanh Toan2, Tran Thanh Thong2, Nguyen Thi Nhan2, Đo Thi Kim Hien2, Trinh Ty Hon2
1 Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy
2 Cho Ray Hospital
3 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Research sonogram characteristic of entheses in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and related factors.


Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study with 87 AS patients in Cho Ray hospital from 10/2022 to 08/2023.


Results: Among 522 tendon attachment points in 87 patients with AS, 37.9% of entheses showed signs of inflammation when examined by software ultrasound. The proportion of tendon attachment points with inflammation on ultrasound but no clinical symptoms of inflammation are 29.9%. Hypoechoic images and increased tendon size are the most common lesions on ultrasound, accounting for 19.9% and 18.3%. No differences were noted in the average duration of illness, the rate of HLA-B27 antigen presence, the increase in CRP levels, the average BASDAI score, the average ASDAS-CRP score between the group of patients with enthesitis on ultrasound compared to the group without inflammation on ultrasound.


Conclustion: Ultrasound is a good tool to help detect and monitor enthesitis in patients with AS. No differences were noted in the average duration of illness, the rate of HLA-B27 antigen presence, the increase in CRP levels, the average BASDAI score, the average ASDAS-CRP score between the group of patients with enthesitis on ultrasound compared to the group without inflammation on ultrasound.

Article Details

References

1. Đại học Y Hà Nội. Bệnh Học Nội Khoa.; 2012.
2. A S, S R, D van der H, et al. What is axial spondyloarthritis? A latent class and transition analysis in the SPACE and DESIR cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(3). doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216516
3. Olivieri I, Barozzi L, Padula A. 7 Enthesiopathy: clinical manifestations, imaging and treatment. Baillières Clin Rheumatol. 1998;12(4):665-681. doi:10.1016/S0950-3579(98)80043-5
4. Sakkas LI, Alexiou I, Simopoulou T, Vlychou M. Enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;43(3):325-334. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.04.005
5. Hamada S A, Sherief E F, Osama K. Value of ultrasound examination of the Leeds Enthesitis Index in assessment of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. Rheum Acta Open Access. 2020;4(1):001-006. doi:10.17352/raoa.000011
6. Ruyssen-Witrand A, Jamard B, Cantagrel A, et al. Relationships between ultrasound enthesitis, disease activity and axial radiographic structural changes in patients with early spondyloarthritis: data from DESIR cohort. RMD Open. 2017;3(2):e000482. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000482
7. D’Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, Brasseur JL, Dougados M, Breban M. Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power Doppler: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(2):523-533. doi:10.1002/art.10812