Role of Dual-Energy CT in Evaluating Urinary Stones

BÁ HỒNG PHONG LÊ1, , Le Cong Duc2, Do Hai Thanh Anh3, Nguyen Dai Hung Linh4
1 Bệnh viện Nguyễn Tri Phương TP Hồ Chí Minh
2 Urology Department – ​​Nguyen Tri Phuong Hospital - Ho Chi Minh City
3 Department of Diagnostic Imaging - Nguyen Tri Phuong Hospital - Ho Chi Minh City
4 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine -Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the detectability of urinary stones on DECT virtual nonenhanced images and examine the diagnostic
performance of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in characterization of in vivo renal stone composition.
Methods: Cross-sectional study from 05/2022 to 10/2023, at Nguyen Tri Phuong Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. DECT images of 197 patients with postsurgical-proven urinary stones were analyzed. All patients were examined with DECT urography in 3 phases: true nonenhanced (TNE) image, pyelographic phase and excretory phase. The contrast medium in the renal pelvis and ureters was virtually removed from pyelographic phase and excretory-phase
images by using postprocessing software, resulting in virtual nonenhanced (VNE) images. The sensitivity regarding the detection of calculi on VNE images compared with true nonenhanced (TNE)
images was determined. Results of the stone compositions were identified on DECT and then were compared to postoperative
infrared spectroscopy stone analysis as the standard reference.
Results: The sensitivity, specificity of VNE created from pyelographic phase for detecting urinary stones were 95,4% and
100%. The sensitivity, specificity of VNE created from excretoryphase were 83,2% and 94,6%. Most urinary stones detected on
VNE appeared smaller. VNE had a moderate detection rate for small stones (<5mm) with the sensitivity of VNE created from the
pyelographic phase was 74,2% and the sensitivity of VNE created from excretory-phase was 31,4%. Most undetected stones were in the urinary calyx with the sensitivity of VNE created from the pyelographic phase was 93,05% and the sensitivity of VNE created from excretory phase was 77,7%.
In term of identifying renal stone composition, the accuracy of DECT was 74,1%. The agreement between DECT and infrared spectroscopy was 0,72. The effective atomic number Zeff helped to

identified Canxi Oxalate with high accuracy (83,3%). The HU ratio cut off to differentiate Struvite stones from Canxi Oxalate stones
was 1.32 with high sensitivity (95%) and high specificity (72%).
Conclusions: VNE can detect large (>5mmmm) calculi with good reliability. VNE created from the pyelographic phase has a higher detectability than VNE created from the excretory phase. DECT was able to determine the composition of urinary tract stones with fair accuracy, especially Canxi oxalate stones. DECT could also differentiate Canxi oxalate stone and Struvite stone.

Article Details

References

1. Liu Y, Chen Y, Liao B, et al. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian J Urol. 2018;5(4):205-214. doi:10.1016/j. ajur.2018.08.007
2. Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A, et al. Detectability of Urinary Stones on Virtual Nonenhanced Images Generated at Pyelographic-Phase Dual-Energy CT. Radiology. 2010;256(1):184-190. doi:10.1148/radiol.10091411
3. Moon JW, Park BK, Kim CK, Park SY. Evaluation of virtual unenhanced CT obtained from dual-energy CT urography for detecting urinary stones. BJR. 2012;85(1014):e176-e181. doi:10.1259/bjr/19566194
4. Park JJ, Park BK, Kim CK. Single-phase DECT with VNCT compared with three phase CTU in patients with haematuria. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(10):3550-3557.doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4206-9
5. Mangold S, Thomas C, Fenchel M, et al. Virtual nonenhanced dual-energy CT urography with tin-filter technology: determinants of detection of urinary calculi in the renal collecting system. Radiology. 2012;264(1):119-125. doi:10.1148/radiol.12110851
6. Kulkarni NM, Eisner BH, Pinho DF, Joshi MC, Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV. Determination
of renal stone composition in phantom and patients using single-source dual-energy computed
tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013;37(1):37-45. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182720f66
7.Ogawa N, Sato S, Ida K, et al. Evaluation of Urinary Stone Composition and Differentiation
between Urinary Stones and Phleboliths Using Single-source Dual-energy Computer Tomography. Acta Med Okayama. 2017;71(2):91-96.doi:10.18926/AMO/54976
8. Corbett JH, Harmse WS. In vovo determination of renal stone composition with dual- energy
computed tomography. South African Journal
7. Ogawa N, Sato S, Ida K, et al. Evaluation of Urinary Stone Composition and Differentiation between Urinary Stones and Phleboliths Using Single-source Dual-energy Computer Tomography. Acta Med Okayama. 2017;71(2):91-96. doi:10.18926/AMO/54976
8. Corbett JH, Harmse WS. In vovo determination of renal stone composition with dual- energy computed tomography. South African Journal of Radiology.2014;18(1):5. doi:10.4102/sajr.v18i1.605
9. Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M, et al. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with x-ray diffraction. Radiology. 2012;257(2):394-401. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100249
10. Mahalingam H, Lal A, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Bhattacharrya S, Khandelwal N. Evaluation of low-dose dualenergy computed tomography for in vi vo assessment of renal/ureteric calculus composition. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(8):587-593. doi:10. 4111/kju.2015.56.8.587
11. Achrya S, Goyal A, Bhalla AS, Sharma R, Seth A, Gupta AK. In vivo characterization of urinary calculi on dualenergy CT: going a step ahead with sub-differentiation of calcium stone. Acta Radiol. 2015;56(7):881-889. doi:10.1177/0284185114538251