CT FEATURES OF CONGENITAL PORTOSYSTEMIC SHUNTS AT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL 2: A CASE SERIES REPORT

NGHIÊM THẢO1, , Văn Tho Huỳnh2, Ho Phi Duy3, Tran Quoc Dạt3, Tran Cong Binh4, Phan Thanh Chi Dung4
1 BỘ MÔN CĐHA - ĐẠI HỌC Y KHOA PHẠM NGỌC THẠCH
2 Khoa Chẩn đoán Hình ảnh - Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 2
3 Department of Hepatology, Pancreatology and Liver Transplantation, Children's Hospital 2.
4 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Children's Hospital 2

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction:
Congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS) are rare vascular anomalies in which portal venous blood bypasses the liver and drains directly into the systemic circulation. These anomalies are often associated with chromosomal abnormalities and have a wide range of clinical manifestations. In some cases, CPSS may be asymptomatic, making diagnosis challenging. The condition can lead to serious complications affecting multiple organ systems, including the liver, central nervous system, and respiratory tract. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the suspicion and diagnosis of CPSS, assessing the extent of the shunt, identifying associated anomalies, and guiding appropriate management strategies.


Objective:
To describe the computed tomography (CT). Imaging features and associated clinical findings of congenital portosystemic shunts diagnosed at Children's Hospital 2.


Material and Methods: A retrospective report of 9 confirmed cases of CPSS diagnosed by CT.


Results:
From April 2022 to October 2022, a total of 9 cases of CPSS were confirmed at Children's Hospital 2. Of these, 7 patients (77.8%) had intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, including 4 cases of type II, 1 case of type III, and 2 cases of type V according to Park's classification. The remaining 2 patients (22.2%) had extrahepatic portosystemic shunts, both classified as type Ib according to Abernethy's classification. Intrahepatic type II shunts were the most common, accounting for 42.9%. The mean age at diagnosis was 19.6 ± 26.8 months, ranging from 5 days to 58 months of age. CPSS was often discovered incidentally during investigations for other congenital anomalies. Four patients (44.4%) had congenital anomalies, with congenital heart disease and hemangiomas being the most common, each observed in 22.2% of cases.


Conclusion:
Congenital portosystemic shunts have diverse clinical presentations, ranging from asymptomatic cases to manifestations resembling neonatal cholestasis or complex congenital malformation syndromes. Imaging evaluation is of paramount importance for diagnosis and treatment planning, helping to prevent severe complications associated with this vascular anomaly.

Article Details

References

1. Bernard O, Franchi-Abella S, Branchereau S, Pariente D, Gauthier F, Jacquemin E. Congenital portosystemic
shunts in children: recognition, evaluation, and management. Seminars in liver disease. Nov 2012;32(4):273-87.
doi:10.1055/s-0032-1329896
2. Lin ZY, Chen SC, Hsieh MY, Wang CW, Chuang WL, Wang LY. Incidence and clinical significance of spontaneous
intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunts detected by sonography in adults without potential cause. Journal of
clinical ultrasound: JCU. Jan 2006;34(1):22-6. doi:10.1002/jcu.20176
3. Morgan G, Superina R. Congenital absence of the portal vein: two cases and a proposed classification system
for portasystemic vascular anomalies. Journal of pediatric surgery. Sep 1994;29(9):1239-41. doi:10.1016/0022-
3468(94)90812-5
4. Park JH, Cha SH, Han JK, Han MC. Intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt. AJR American journal of
roentgenology. Sep 1990;155(3):527-8. doi:10.2214/ajr.155.3.2117349
5. Ghuman SS, Gupta S, Buxi TB, et al. The Abernethy malformation-myriad imaging manifestations of a single
entity. The Indian journal of radiology & imaging. Jul-Sep 2016;26(3):364-372. doi:10.4103/0971-3026.190420
6. Franchi-Abella S, Branchereau S, Lambert V, et al. Complications of congenital portosystemic shunts in children:
therapeutic options and outcomes. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Sep 2010;51(3):322-30.
doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181d9cb92
7. Sokollik C, Bandsma RH, Gana JC, van den Heuvel M, Ling SC. Congenital portosystemic shunt: characterization
of a multisystem disease. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Jun 2013;56(6):675-81. doi:10.1097/
MPG.0b013e31828b3750
8. Abernethy J. Account of Two Instances of Uncommon Formation in the Viscera of the Human Body: From the
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Medical facts and observations. 1797;7:100-108.
9. Alonso-Gamarra E, Parrón M, Pérez A, Prieto C, Hierro L, López-Santamaría M. Clinical and radiologic
manifestations of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts: a comprehensive review. Radiographics. MayJun 2011;31(3):707-22. doi:10.1148/rg.313105070
10. Pupulim LF, Vullierme MP, Paradis V, Valla D, Terraz S, Vilgrain V. Congenital portosystemic shunts associated
with liver tumours. Clinical radiology. Jul 2013;68(7):e362-9. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.024
11. Saito M, Seo Y, Yano Y, et al. Successful treatment using coil embolization of a symptomatic intrahepatic
portosystemic venous shunt developing through a patent ductus venosus in a noncirrhotic adult. Internal medicine.
2013;52(5):555-9. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.52.9110
12. Yoshimoto Y, Shimizu R, Saeki T, et al. Patent ductus venosus in children: a case report and review of the literature.
Journal of pediatric surgery. Jan 2004;39(1):E1-5. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.09.035
13. Kamimatsuse A, Onitake Y, Kamei N, et al. Surgical intervention for patent ductus venosus. Pediatric surgery
international. Oct 2010;26(10):1025-30. doi:10.1007/s00383-010-2662-x