Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 11/07/2022
Online Published: 11/07/2022
Abstract Views: 710
Views PDF: 263
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.10.276.2012
Issue
No. 10 (2012)
Section
Scientific research
How to Cite
Doan, V. N., Dao, D. V., & Le, V. K. (2022). Value of CT- Scanner in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Vietnamese Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 10, 370-375. https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.10.276.2012

Value of CT- Scanner in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Doan Van Ngoc1, Dao Danh Vinh2, Le Van Khang2,
1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging from the Faculty of Medicine at the University National Hanoi
2 Bach Mai Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

SUMMARY


Acute appendicitis is most common in emergency surgical abdominal pathology. CT- Scanner is usually applied in atypical form of acute appendicitis which making difficult for diagnosis. Prompt CT-Scanner diagnosis can reduce the follow–up time,
exclude the wrong so as justify the perforated one.
Objective: Imaging description and assess the value of CTScanner in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Subjects and Methods: Cross-section descriptions of 92 subjects were clinically diagnosed pre-operation. CT scanner was carried out also before surgery. The CT-Scanner results was confronted to results of surgery and anatomopathology. Study performed in the Department of Surgery of Bach Mai Hospital from December 2008 to July 2010.
Results: The average diameter of the appendix inflammation was 10.32 ± 0.49 mm (min 5 mm, max 30 mm). Inflamed appendix diameter was more than 6 mm (83.5%) and wall thickness more than 2 mm (85.7%). Fat infiltration and fluid around the appendix was 84.6% and 50.5%, respectively. Appendix high density was compared with caecum (29.7%) and appendix enhancement was 89.0%. Thickness of caecum localized around the base of the appendix (26.4%). Stone of appendix, ganglion mesentericum and perforation complication were seen in 38.5%, 12.9% and 29.7%, respectively.
Conclusion: The CT-Scanner was very effective in diagnsosis of appendicitis, especially in difficult cases. It confirmed the location, size and complications of appencitis. The value of this modality is higher than US.

Article Details

Keywords

Acute Appendicitis, Acute abdominal pain, CT scanner

References

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. Trần Hiếu Học và cs. (2009), “Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi trong điều trị viêm ruột thừa cấp tại khoa ngoại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai năm 2007”, Tạp chí Y học thực hành, (tập 662, số 5), tr 47-49.
2. Balthazar E J và cs. (1991), “Appendicitis: Prospective Evaluation with High-Resolution CT’” Radiology, 180: 21-24.
3. Bernard A B (2000), “Appendicitis at the Millennium”, Radiology, 215: 337-348.
4. Caroline K và cs. (2004), “Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Unenhanced Multi–Detector Row CT”, Radiology, 232: 164-172.
5. Masahiro T và cs. (2008), “Perforated and Nonperforated Appendicitis:Defect in Enhancing Appendiceal Wall-Depiction with Multi-Detector Row CT”, Radiology, 246:142-147.
6. Mindy M H (2003), “Differentiation of Perforated from Nonperforated Appendicitis at CT”, Radiology 227:46-51.
7. Rao P M và cs. (Feb 1997), “Appendicitis: use of arrowhead sign for diagnosis at CT”, Radiology, 202:363-366.
8. Richard M và cs. (1994), “Acute appendicitis: A practical approach”, The Radiologist, No 1, p 187.
9. Sarah D B và cs. (2006), “Perforated versus Nonperforated Acute Appendicitis: Accuracy of Multidetector CT Detection”, Radiology, 241:780-786.