The preliminary result of endovascular treatment in spinal vascular malformation

Vu Dang Luu1, Dinh Trung Thanh1, Tran Anh Tuan1, Pham Minh Thong1,
1 Imaging dept Bach Mai Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

SUMMARY


Objective: To evaluate the preliminary result of endovascular
treatment in spinal vascular malformation.
Material and method: We prospectively studied patients with
spinal arteriovenous shunt who were diagnosed and endovascular
treatement with spinal arteriovenous shunt at Bach Mai hospital
from 2012 to 2013. Clinical features were analyzed before and
after treatment by Aminoff-Logue disability scale. MR imaging
characteristics were evaluated.
Result: 9 patients were treated by endovascular embolization,
44.4% were spinal arteriovenous malformation, 55.6% were spinal
dural arteriovenous fistulae. MRI studies showed intramedullary
increased T2 signal and dilated venous drainage in all patients. The
rate of complete angiographic obliteration was 55.5% and nearly
occluded in 45.5 . After follow up of 3 months, clinically significance
improvement was achieved in 66.7%, partial recovery in 22.2%.
Conclusion: n-BCA glue embolization for spinal arteriovenous
shunt should be considered the treatment of choice with satisfactory outcomes. Large studies with longer follow-up are required to determinate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment.

Article Details

References

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. Aminoff, M.J. and V. Logue, The prognosis of patients with spinal vascular malformations. Brain, 1974. 97(1): p. 211-8.
2. Saraf-Lavi, E., et al., Detection of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae with MR imaging and contrastenhanced MR angiography: sensitivity, specificity, and
prediction of vertebral level. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002. 23(5): p. 858-67.
3. Niimi, Y., et al., Symptoms,Vascular anatomy and endovascular treatment of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations. Interv Neuroradiol, 2000. 6 Suppl 1: p.
199-202.
4. Cho, W.S., et al., Clinical features and treatment outcomes of the spinal arteriovenous fistulas and malformations. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013. 19(2): p. 207- 16.
5. Wilson, D.A., et al., Multimodality treatment of conus medullaris arteriovenous malformations: 2 decades of experience with combined endovascular and microsurgical treatments. Neurosurgery, 2012. 71(1): p. 100-8.
6. Rodesch, G. and P. Lasjaunias, Spinal cord arteriovenous shunts: from imaging to management. Eur J Radiol, 2003. 46(3): p. 221-32.
7. Fugate, J.E., G. Lanzino, and A.A. Rabinstein, Clinical presentation and prognostic factors of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: an overview. Neurosurg Focus, 2012. 32(5): p. E17.