Evaluating the results of prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe techniques and early outcomes of PAE in treating BPH patients.
Method and results: from 12/2013 to 11/2014 performed 12 times PAE, average age = 67.1 (51-84), before-intervention average evaluation IPSS, Qol, Qmax (ml/s), PVR (ml), PSA (ng/ml), PV (cm3) are 26.6; 4.8; 8.86; 59; 4.95; 68.7 Post-intervention 3 months decreased 45.86%; 41.67%; 55.76%; 37.96%; 28.75%, 25.47%.
Conclusion: PAE in BPH is safe and effective at the Radiology Department at Bach Mai Hospital.
Article Details
Keywords
prostatic arterial embolization, benign prostatic hyperplasia
References
1. Trần Đức Thọ, Đánh giá tác dụng của viên nang trinh nữ hoàng cung trong điều trị phì đại lành tính tiền liệt tuyến, 2005.
2. Rubenstein, J.M., Kevin T, Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy of the Prostate (TUMT). eMedicine (Abadia-Cardoso, Anderson et al. 2013), 6
February 2008.
3. Pinto I, Chimeno P, Romo A et al (2003) Uterine fibroids: uterine artery embolization versus abdominal hysterectomy for treatment—a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Radiology 226(2):425–431
4. Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Bartholomeus W, de Blok S, Birnie E, Reekers JA, Ankum WM (2007) Sexuality and body image after uterine artery
embolization and hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a randomized comparison. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 30(5):866–875
5. Walker WJ, Pelage JP (2002) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. BJOG
109(11):1262–1272
6. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P et al (2000) Fibroidrelated menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm followup. Radiology 215(2):428– 431
7. Pisco Martin et al (2012) Prostate embolization artery for prostate benign hyperplasia: short – intermediate term result: Radiology, Volume 266:
number 3.
2. Rubenstein, J.M., Kevin T, Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy of the Prostate (TUMT). eMedicine (Abadia-Cardoso, Anderson et al. 2013), 6
February 2008.
3. Pinto I, Chimeno P, Romo A et al (2003) Uterine fibroids: uterine artery embolization versus abdominal hysterectomy for treatment—a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Radiology 226(2):425–431
4. Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Bartholomeus W, de Blok S, Birnie E, Reekers JA, Ankum WM (2007) Sexuality and body image after uterine artery
embolization and hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a randomized comparison. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 30(5):866–875
5. Walker WJ, Pelage JP (2002) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. BJOG
109(11):1262–1272
6. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P et al (2000) Fibroidrelated menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm followup. Radiology 215(2):428– 431
7. Pisco Martin et al (2012) Prostate embolization artery for prostate benign hyperplasia: short – intermediate term result: Radiology, Volume 266:
number 3.