Study of imaging characteristic and value of 64-slice CT in diagnosis of Adrenal tumor

Dr Nguyen Minh Chau1, Dr Nguyen Duy Hue2
1 Imaging dept, Hanoi E Hospital
2 Imaging dept, Vietnam-Germany Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to describe the characteristic and value of diagnostic adrenal tumor on 64-slice CT scanner
Materials and Methods: Prospective and cross-sectional descriptive study of 39 patients were diagnosed adrenal tumor on
64-slice CT scanner. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the value of size, the attenuation values at the unenhanced CT and the relative percentage washout (RPW) and absolute percentage washout (APW) values for the differential diagnosis of adenoma from nonadenoma.
Results: Adrenal tumor was common as adenoma (16/38) with the feature of often homogeneous, clearly limited and small
size (2.5 cm), and about 11.5 HU on precontrast attenuation. Pheocromocytoma was often heterogeneous, large size of 4.76cm
and in conjunction with high levels of dynamic enhancement (108.3 Hu and 111.7 Hu). Tumor adrenal malignant was large size of 8.83cm, often unknown limits, infiltrates surrounding and invading IVC (2/3 cases). The area under the ROC curve and cut off with size were 0.896 and 3.29 cm, the attenuation values at the unenhanced CT were 0.984 and 24 Hu, APW were 0.937 and 57.6% and RPW were 0.994 and 43.7% (p <0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy at the threshold size of 3.29 cm were 88.2%, 90.9% and 89.7%, respectively; at threshold 24 Hu were 94.1%, 95% and 94.6%; at threshold APW = 57.6% and RPW = 43.7% were 94.1%, 85%, 89.2% and 94.1%, 100%, 97.3%, respectively.
Conclusion: 64-slice CT scanner is effective methods to characterize and diagnose adrenal tumor. The relative percentage
washout (RPW), absolute percentage washout (APW), the attenuation values at the unenhanced CT and the size criteria appear
optimal for discriminating an adrenal adenoma from a nonadenoma..

Article Details

References

1. Angelelli G,Mancini M.E,Moschetta M et al (2013). MDCT in the differentiation of adrenal masses: comparison between different scan
delays for the evaluation of intralesional washout. ScientificWorldJournal, 2013, 957680.
2. Korobkin M,Brodeur FJ,Francis IR et al (1998). CT time-attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 170 (3), 747-52.
3. Caoili EM,Korobkin M,Francis IR et al (2000). Delayed enhanced CT of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 175 (5), 1411-5.
4. Szolar DH,Korobkin M,Reittner P et al (2005). Adrenocortical carcinomas and adrenal pheochromocytomas: mass and enhancement loss
evaluation at delayed contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology, 234 (2), 479-85.
5. Park SH,Kim MJ,Kim JH et al (2007). Differentiation of adrenal adenoma and nonadenoma in unenhanced CT: new optimal threshold value and the usefulness of size criteria for differentiation. Korean J Radiol, 8 (4), 328-35.
6. Johnson PT,Horton KM, Fishman EK (2009). Adrenal mass imaging with multidetector CT: pathologic conditions, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics, 29 (5), 1333-51.
7. Johnson PT,Horton KM, Fishman EK (2009). Adrenal imaging with multidetector CT: evidencebased protocol optimization and interpretative practice. Radiographics, 29 (5), 1319-31.
8. Mohamed RE,Abodewan KA-e-W, Amin MA (2013). Diagnostic value of delayed washout rate of contrastenhanced multi-detector computed tomography in adrenal incidentalomas. Alexandria Journal of Medicine, (0)
9. Chiche L,Dousset B,Kieffer E et al (2006). Adrenocortical carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava: presentation of a 15-patient series and
review of the literature. Surgery, 139 (1), 15-27.