MRI imaging in oral and pharyngeal cancer in Danang cancer hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
SUMMARY
Background: Oral and pharyngeal tumor are more common today and it has complex structure limiting for the paraclinic examination. CT scan was a first choiced to examine the stage of tumor, especially invasion of tumor to the skull base but nowaday CT scan has been displaced by MRI, which has high value to detect soft tissue tumor with high sensitive and acurracy. MRI also gives the
best informstion about anatomy in 2D and 3D.
Object and Method: Cross study, clinical examination find out tumor in the oral or pharyngeal then takes the MRI picture, we
except the patient without hystopathology and treated for cancer before. Coletting the MRI images data in T1W, T2W, STIR, T1W Gd.
Object: MRI machine Siemens 3.0Tesla Model Verio A Tim System T-class, Coil 3T neck A Timy System, Dotarem 10ml.
Method: We decribe every characteristics of MRI images in TIRM Cor, Ax và Sag T1W; Ax và Sag T2W; Ax, Cor và Sag T1 FS+Gd pulse then comparing this characteristics with grade histopathology.
Result: Age: 59.6; male/female=2.5/1; tumor in oral cavity: 35.6%; in hypopharyngeal 23.8%; nasopharyngeal 22% and oropharyngeal 18%. Diameter max: 3.17cm ±1.6. Characteristics
in MRI: 80% hypointensity in T1W, 76% hypersignal in T2W, 81% hyperintensity in STIR, 79% medium - strong enhance in T1W Gd
with this feature the sensitives and acuracy to diagnostic degree malignant of tumor: sensitives and acuracy in T1W: 86% and 71%;
in T2W is 84% and 85%, STIR: 90% and 85%; T1W Gd: 86% and 71%.
Conclusion: MRI has high value to diagnostic in oral and pharyngeal cancer. Especially, MRI play an important role to determine the grade of cancer with high sensitive and acuracy.
Article Details
Keywords
Oral and pharyngeal tumor, MRI
References
2. Nguyễn Trọng Minh, Đào Duy Khanh (2011), Nhận xét bước đầu về tình hình ung thư vòm tại phía nam nhân 500 trường hợp được chẩn đoán tại Phòng khám Tai mũi họng Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Tạp chí Y học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, phụ bản số 7.
3. Nguyễn Quang Quyền, (2007), Giải phẫu đầu mặt cổ, Nhà xuất bản Y học, trang 79.
4. Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek, Ann King, MRI and CT of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, AJR:198, January 2012.
5. Brown LM, Check DP, Devesa SS. , (2011), Oropharyngeal cancer incidence trends: diminishing racial disparities, Epub 2011 Mar 5, 22(5):753-63..
6. American Cancer Sociaty, Oral cavity and Oropharyngeal cancer, American Cancer Sociaty 2013, access at www.cancer.gov.
7. Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer Globally, as of 2010, access at: http://www.cancer.net/cancertypes/ oral-and-oropharyngeal-cancer/statistics
8. Naoko Saito, MD, PhD, Rohini N. Nadgir, MD, (2012), Posttreatment CT and MRI imaing in head and neck cancer: What the radiologist need to know, RadioGraphics 2012;32:1261–1282.
9. Min-Sik Kim, MD, PhD, Kwang-Jae Cho, (2007), Invasion Depth by MRI in Oral-Oropharyngeal Cancer, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg August 2010, vol. 143 no.
2 suppl P64. Access at: http://oto.sagepub.com/ content/143/2_suppl/P64.1.full
10. Imaging tests for throat cancer, access at: http://www.cancercenter.com/throat-cancer/imagingtests/
11. Sigal.R,Zagdanski A.M, Schwaab.G, CT and MR imaging of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Access at: http:// radiographics.16.4.8835972
12.Soft Tissue Tumors of the Head and Neck: Imaging-based Review of the WHO Classification 2011, RSNA Radiographic, Volumn 11, issue 7, access at: http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/rg.317115095
13. Ligier K, Belot A, Launoy G, Velten M, Bossard N, Iwaz J, Righini CA, Delafosse P, Guizard AV, (2011), Descriptive epidemiology of upper aerodigestive tract cancers in France: incidence over 1980-2005 and projection to 2010, Oral Oncol. 2011, Apr;47(4):302-7.