Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 51
Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of Ischemia Heart Disease
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Evaluation of the diagnostic of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of significant
obstructive coronary artery disease in comparison to invasive coronary angiography.
Material and Methods: 36 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease/ 25 males (69.4%) with mean age: 65.53±10.48 year
underwent 1.5 Tesla CMR including cine, short axis to evaluate EF, EDV, ESV, stress PERF (adenosine 140 μg/min/kg), rest
PERF (SSFP, 3 short axis, 1 saturation prepulse per slice) and LGE (3D inversion recovery technique) using Gd-BOPTA. Images
were analyzed visually. Stenosis >50% in invasive angiography was considered significant
Results: Mean study time was: 45.44±9.18 minutes, EF: 45.06±15.66%, Hypokinesia: 44.4%, Akinesia :27.8%. The overall
patient-based analysis demonstrated a high sensitivity, specificity and PPV for perfusion was 93.3%; 83.3%; 96.6% and moderate
NPV 71.4%. A good relation (p<0.01) between deficit perfusion state correlation with coronary stenosis of LAD, RCA, LCx.
Conclusion: Stress perfusion CMR with Adenosine is highlysensitive and specificity for detection of coronary artery disease.
Article Details
Keywords
Cardiac Magnetic Resonace (CMR), diagnose, coronary artery disease, ischemia heart disease (IHD), coronary artery, perfusion, Adenosine
References
2. Nguyễn Đại Hùng Linh (2009), Đánh giá sống còn và tưới máu cơ tim trong bệnh tim thiếu máu cục bộ, Luận văn thạc sỹ y học, trường ĐH Y dược TP HCM
3. Nguyễn Thị Thu Hoài (2002), Nghiên cứu đối chiếu phương pháp siêu âm tim stress bằng Dobutamin với chụp động mạch vành trong chẩn đoán bệnh tim thiếu máu cục bộ, Luận văn thạc sỹ y học, Đại học Y Hà Nội.
4. Christoph Klein, Rolf Gebker, Thomas Kokocinski, Stephan Dreysse1, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Eckart Fleck and Eike Nagel (2008), “Combined magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging, myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients with suspected coronary artery disease”, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; 2008, 10:45.
5. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al (2002), “Assessment of myocardial viability with contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography”, Circulation; 2002;105:162-7.
6. D Karamitsos, Ntobeko AB Ntusi (2010), “Jane Feasibility and safety of high-dose adenosine perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance”, J Cardiovasc Magn Reso;2010; 12(1): 66
7. Lê Thị Thùy Liên, “Bước đầu áp dụng cộng hưởng từ tim trong chẩn đoán bệnh tim thiếu máu cục bộ mạn tính”. Luận văn Bác sĩ nội trú, trường ĐH Y Hà Nội, 2011.
8. Theodoros D Karamitsos, N.A.N., Jane Feasibility and safety of high-dose adenosine perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reso, 2010. 12(1): 66.
9. Michele Hamon, G.F., Guilaume Nee, Javed Ehtisham, Remy Morello and Martal Hamon, Metaanalysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2010. 12:29.