Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 59
The correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and immunohistological marker ki-67 in the preoperative grading of glioma
Main Article Content
Abstract
SUMMARY
Purpose: To study the correlation between apparent
diffusion coefficient (ADC) and immunohistological marker Ki-67 in the preoperative grading of glioma.
Materials and methods: cMRI, DWI were preoperatively
performed in 15 patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas and Ki67 was done in Choray hospital from 1/2015 to 1/2016. The ADC value were measured at tumortissue (ADCt) and contralateral normal brain (ADCc). ADCn were calculated by divided ADCt to ADCn. Ki67 were calculated semi quantitatively. Grade of gliomas were divided to low and high gradegroup. The correlation between ADC values and Ki67 in the grade gliomas were analyzed.
Results: The ADCt, ADCn values of high-grade gliomas
were significantly lower than those of low-grade gliomas (1156.48 mm2/s and 744.26 mm2/s, p=0.036). The ADCt, ADCn values of tumor parenchyma were negatively correlated with the degree of malignancy of the gliomas(r=-0.567,p=0.028). The Ki-67 labeling index was significantly positive correlation with the degree of
malignancy of the gliomas (r=1, p=0.00). The Ki-67 labeling index was negatively correlated with the ADCt and ADCn values in the grading of glioma (r =-0.515; p=0.049 and r =-0.567, p=0.028).
Conclusion: The ADC values of tumor and the Ki-67 labeling index were negatively correlated in the grading of glioma.The ADC values were negatively correlated and the Ki-67 labeling index were positively correlated in the grading of glioma.
Article Details
Keywords
Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), immunohistological marker, Ki-67, correlation, grade, gliomas
References
Assessment with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and
Proton MR Spectroscopy”.AJR, 188(A),43-46.
2. Anne J Skjulsvik (2014).Ki-67/MIB-1
immunostaining in a cohort of human gliomas, Int J Clin
Exp Pathol. 7(12): 8905–8910.
3. Bulakbasi N, Guvenc I, Onguru O. (2004).
The added value of the apparent diffusion coefficient
calculation to magnetic resonance imaging in the
differentiation and grading of malignant brain tumors. J
Comput Assist Tomogr;28:735–46.
4. Hirotaka Fudaba (2014). Comparison of
Multiple Parameters Obtained on 3T Pulsed Arterial
Spin-Labeling, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and MRS and
the Ki-67 Labeling Index in Evaluating Glioma Grading,
American Journal of Neuroradiology; 35(11)
5. Johannessen AL, Torp SH. (2006). The
clinical value of Ki-67/MIB-1 labeling index in human
astrocytomas. Pathol Oncol Res.12:143–147.
6. Kitis O, Altay H, Calli C (2005). Minimum
apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain
tumors. Eur J Radiol;55:393–400.
7. Meng Law (2003). “Glioma grading: sensitivity,
specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR
imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging
compared with conventional MR imaging”.AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 24:1989-1998.
8. Quinn T. Ostrom. (2015).Current Understanding
and Treatment of Gliomas, Springer.
9. Scha (2006). Update on Brain Tumor Imaging:
From Anatomy to Physiology, AJNR27: 475-487.
10. Takei H, Powell SZ. (2010). Novel
immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of nonglial
tumors of nervous system. Adv Anat Pathol. 17:150–153.
11. Yang D (2002). «Cerebral gliomas: prospective
comparison of multivoxel 2D chemical-shift imaging proton
MR spectroscopy, echoplanar perfusion and diffusionweighted
MRI».Neuroradiology, 44(8), 656-666.
12. Yin Y (2012). Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 in the diagnosis of gliomas, Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 34(5):503-8.