Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 109
MULTI-SLICE CT IMAGING IN MAXILLOFACIAL FRACTURES BY TRAFFIC ACCIDENT
Main Article Content
Abstract
Summary
Objectives: study the multi-slice CT (MSCT) imaging in the diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures by traffic accident.
Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of 63 patients with maxillofacial trauma due to traffic accidents who underwent MSCT scan at Viet Duc Hospital in April 2022. Results: 46 male and 17 female. The mean age was 28.4±12.6 (from 15 to 75 years old). The most common traffic accidents are motorbike-motorcycle accidents with 21/63 (33.3%), self-motorbike-riding accidents are 18/63 (28.6%), car-motorcycle accidents account for 16 /63 (25.4%), pedestrian - car/motorcycle accidents are 5/63 (7.9%) and car-car accidents are 3/63 (4.8%). There were 28/63 (44.4%) cases associated with cranial fracture and 32/63 (50.8%) skull base fracture. In cases of maxillofacial fracture, orbital wall fracture was the most common with 41/63 (65.1%), maxillary fracture 39/63 (61.9%), zygomatic fracture 32/63 (50.8%), nose bone 19/63 (30.2%), frontal sinus wall 13/63 (20.6%), palatal and mandibular fracture were 11/6 (17.5%). The most common type of maxillary fractures is Lefort 1 with 11/63 (17, 5%) on both right and left side, Lefort 2 and 3 fractures are less common with 1.6% to 6.3%, respectively. Conclusion: MSCT is a reliable method in diagnosing maxillofacial fractures.
Article Details
Keywords
maxillofacial trauma, traffic accident, computer tomography
References
2. Ahmad K, Rauniyar RK, Gupta MK, et al. Multidetector computed tomographic evaluation of
maxillofacial trauma. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences.2014;5(4):39-43. doi:org/10.3126/ajms.v5i4.9561
3. Meara DJ. Diagnostic Imaging of the Maxillofacial Trauma Patient. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America.2019;27(2):119-126. doi:10.1016/j.cxom.2019.05.004
4. de Carvalho MF, Vieira JNM, Figueiredo R, et al. Validity of computed tomography in diagnosing midfacial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2021;50(4):471-476. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.09.002
5. Talari H, Moussavi N, Hoseinzadeh A, et al. Wisconsin criteria and necessity for computed tomography in patients with maxillofacial trauma: A diagnostic value study. Report. Archives of Trauma Research.2021;10:92.
6. Jarrahy R, Vo V, Goenjian HA, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Maxillofacial Trauma Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Scans: Comparison of Oral Surgeons, Head and Neck Surgeons, Plastic Surgeons, and Neuroradiologists. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.2011;127(6)
7. Al-Hassani A, Ahmad K, El-Menyar A, et al. Prevalence and patterns of maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective descriptive study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg.2019;doi:10.1007/s00068-019-01174-6
8. Juncar M, Tent PA, Juncar RI, et al. An epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures: a 10-year cross-sectional cohort retrospective study of 1007 patients. BMC Oral Health.2021;21(1):128. doi:10.1186/s12903-021-01503-5
9. Mijiti A, Ling W, Tuerdi M, et al. Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures treated at a university hospital, Xinjiang, China: A 5-year retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2014;42(3):227-33. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.005
10. Joshi UM, Ramdurg S, Saikar S, et al. Brain Injuries and Facial Fractures: A Prospective Study of Incidence of Head Injury Associated with Maxillofacial Trauma. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.2018;17(4):531-537. doi:10.1007/s12663-017-1078-8