Effect Of Blood Glucose On Image Quality And Suvmax In Pet/Ct Scans

Viết Định Mai1, , Ngọc Hải Hà1, Công Huấn Phan1, Huyền Trang Hoàng Thị2, Kim Lưu Nguyễn1, Tran Van Bien3, Nguyen Thi Tra My3, Hoang Van An3, Chu Khanh Linh3, Nguyen Viet Chinh3
1 Bệnh viện Đại Học Phenikaa
2 Bệnh viện Bạch Mai
3 Phenikaa University Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of blood glucose levels on image quality and SUV values in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging.


        Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 200 lung cancer patients undergoing pre-treatment staging PET/CT scans at Phenikaa University Hospital from January 2025 to June 2025. Patients were classified into four groups based on pre-injection blood glucose levels: <6.1 mmol/L; 6.1–8.3 mmol/L; 8.4–11.1 mmol/L; and >11.1 mmol/L. Image quality was independently assessed by two nuclear medicine physicians using a 5-point scale. The SUVmax of the target lesion was also recorded.


        Results: Image quality and SUVmax progressively decreased as blood glucose levels increased. The group with glucose <6.1 mmol/L had the highest average image quality score (4.8 points) and an average SUVmax of 12.4. In contrast, the group with glucose >11.1 mmol/L had the lowest average image quality score (2.8 points), an average SUVmax of 8.1, and a scan repetition rate of 15.2%. These findings clearly demonstrate the significant impact of blood glucose on image noise and lesion detectability.


         Conclusion: Elevated blood glucose levels significantly reduce image quality and SUVmax. It is recommended that the ideal glucose level be <6.1 mmol/L and should be maintained below 8.3 mmol/L prior to scanning.

Article Details

References

1. Shankar, L. K., Hoffman, J. M., Bacharach, S., et al. (2006). Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in National Cancer Institute trials. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 47(6), 1059-1066.
2. Boellaard, R., Delgado-Bolton, R., Oyen, W. J. G., et al. (2015). FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: Version 2.0. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 42(2), 328-354.
3. Evangelista, L., Rubini, G., Gallo, M., Gori, S., on behalf of AIMN/AMD/AIOM. (2020). Management of blood glucose levels in oncological patients scheduled for FDG PET/CT examination (Consensus). European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 47(1), 11-27.
4. Eskian M., et al. (2019). Effect of blood glucose level on standardized uptake value (SUV) in 18F-FDG PET-scan: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20,807 individual SUV measurements. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 46(12), 2419–2433.
5. RSNA QIBA. (2014). UPICT FDG-PET/CT protocol (pre-release draft v1.0). Available from https://qibawiki.rsna.org
6. RSNA QIBA. (2014). Quantitative FDG-PET/CT oncology imaging profile (v1.14). Available from https://qibawiki. rsna.org
7. Sudo, H., et al. (2014). Relationship between whole-body distribution of ¹⁸F-FDG and body components based on race and gender. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 55(9), 1438–1444.
8. Nguyen, V. H., Nguyen, Q. T., et al. (2022). Characteristics of PET/CT imaging in esophageal cancer patients. Vietnam Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 12(2), 45-52.
9. Tran, M. H., Nguyen, T. T., et al. (2023). SUVmax value in non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma patients on PET/CT. Vietnam Journal of Medicine, 52(4), 67-74.
10. Pham, V. A., Le, T. T., et al. (2021). Characteristics of PET/CT imaging in gastric cancer. Vietnam Journal of Medicine, 509(2), 120-127 11. Werner, H., Mankoff, D., Pryma, D. A., et al. (2020). SNMMI procedure standard for FDG PET/CT imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61(12), 1852-1864.
11. Werner, H., Mankoff, D., Pryma, D. A., et al. (2020). SNMMI procedure standard for FDG PET/CT imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61(12), 1852-1864.
12. Koo, P. J., Waclawiw, M. A., Hickey, L., et al. (2007). Metformin-induced colonic FDG uptake in diabetic patients: A clinical observation on FDG PET/CT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 34(10), 1559- 1565.