Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 15/06/2022
Online Published: 26/02/2020
Abstract Views: 119
Views PDF: 46
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.37.161.2020
Issue
No. 37 (2020)
Section
Scientific research
How to Cite
Nguyen, M. T., Nguyen, T. K., Pham, T. A., Phan, T. H., & Nguyen, T. V. (2020). Transrectal sonoelastography in detection of prostatecancer: initial assessment of 101 cases. Vietnamese Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 37, 73-78. https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.37.161.2020

Transrectal sonoelastography in detection of prostatecancer: initial assessment of 101 cases

Dr Nguyen Minh Thien1,, Dr Nguyen Minh Thien1, Dr Pham The Anh2, Dr Phan Thanh Hai2, Dr Nguyen Tuan Vinh3
1 Medic medical central
2 Medic medical Central
3 Binh Dan Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate the efficiency of transrectal strain elastography (SE) and transrectal B-mode ultrasonography (TRUS) in determining prostate cancer.
Material & Methods: From 20/6/2015 to 10/9/2015, There are 101 patients with PSA level of higher 4ng/ml have been selected. Abnormal echo regions in
prostate were found via conventional TRUS in those patients, then Abnormal echo regions would be evaluated by real-time strain ultrasound elastography.
Patients have undergone six core biopsies by transperineal approach. Experimental studies
Results: Comparising between 3 methods: B-mode TRUS, strain elastography and DRE about sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and
negative predictive value (NPV). (table)
Table.Comparising between 3 methods: B-mode TRUS, strain elastography
and DRE.
                           Sensitivity(%)                         Specificity(%)                                    PPV(%)                                NPV(%)
B-mode                    88.5                                          55.1                                                67.6                                  81.8
Strain-elasto            94.2                                         65.3                                                74.2                                   91.4
DRE                           69.2                                         98                                                    98                                      75
Conclusions: Sonoelastographyprovidesmore information to detect prostate cancer and biopsy guidance. SE reached a higher sensitivity and specificity than B-mode US in the detection prostate cancer.Strain ultrasound elastography can be used as routine as colour Doppler

Article Details

Keywords

sonelastography, strain ultrasound elastography, prostate cancer, ultrasound.

References

1. Cancer Facts & Figures. (2014), http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/webcontent/acspc-042151.pdf.
2. SEER Stat Fact Sheets (2014); Prostate cancer. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html. Accessed 5 July 2014
3. Ophir J., I. Cespedes, et al (1991), “Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticityof biological tissues”, Ultrasonic Imaging, Vol.13, No.2, pp.111–134.
4. Krouskop T.A., T.M.Wheeler, et al (1999), “Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues undercompression”, Ultrasonic Imaging, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 260–274.
5. Cosgrove D., F. Piscaglia, J. Bamber et al (2013), “EFSUMB guidelinesand recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography.Part 2: clinical applications,” Ultraschall in der Medizin, Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 238–253.
6. Barr R. G., R. Memo, C. R. Schaub (2012), “Shear wave ultrasoundelastography of the prostate: initial results,” Ultrasound Quarterly,vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 13–20.
7. Antonio Galfano, Giacomo Novara, et al (2007), Prostate Biopsy: The Transperineal Approach. eau-ebu update series 5 : 241–249.
8. Ferrari F.S., A. Scorzelli, A. Megliola, et al (2009), Real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate tumor. J Ultrasound; 12(1): 22–31.
9. McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA (1988), Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread. Am J Surg Pathol 12 (12): 897-906
10. Correas J. M., E. Drakonakis, et al (2013), “Update on ultrasound elastography: miscellanea. Prostate, testicle, musculoskeletal”, European Journal of Radiology,vol.82,no.11,pp. 1904-1912
11. Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, et al (2007), Real-time elastography for detecting prostatecancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int; 100 (1):42-6.
12. Salomon G, Köllerman J, et al (2008), Evaluation of prostate cancer detection withultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol; 54 (6):1354-62.
13. Giurgiu CR, Manea C, et al (2011), Real-time sonoelastography in the diagnosis of prostatecancer. Med Ultrason; 13(1): 5-9.
14. Dudea SM, Giurgiu CR, et al (2011), Value of ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis and management of prostate carcinoma. Med Ultrason; 13 (1):45-53.
15. Correas JM, Khairoune A, et al (2012), Trans-rectal quantitative shear wave elastography: application to prostate cancer a feasibility study. In: EuropeanCongress of adiology.
16. Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR. (2012), Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound quarterly; 28 (1): 13-20.
17. Tsutsumi M, Miyagawa T, et al (2007), The impact of real-time tissue elasticityimaging (elastography) on the detection of prostate cancer: clinicopathological analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 12 (4):250-5