Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 11/07/2022
Online Published: 11/07/2022
Abstract Views: 245
Views PDF: 429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.6.240.2012
Issue
No. 6 (2012)
Section
Scientific research
How to Cite
Bui, Q. B., Le, M. H., & Le, N. H. (2022). Quantitative evaluation of Tc99m – DT PA Renoscintigraphy parameters in healthy people. Vietnamese Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 6, 110-114. https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.6.240.2012

Quantitative evaluation of Tc99m – DT PA Renoscintigraphy parameters in healthy people

Bui Quang Bieu1, Le Manh Ha1, Le Ngoc Ha1,
1 108 Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

SUMMARY


Aims: The purpose of our study was to determinate quantitative parameters in Tc99m-DTPA Renoscintigraphy in healthy people.
Materials and Methods: Tc99m-DTPA renoscintigraphy was performed in 44 consecutive healthy people, mostly potential
live kidney donors in Nuclear Medicne Department, 108 central
military hospital. Quantitative parameters including Glomerular
Filtration Rate (GFR) were determined by gamma camera using
the dedicated software.
Results: There were no significant differences of kidney areas, depths and quantitative parameters such as perfusion %, uptake % between the two kidneys. There was no diffirence between mean GFR ± SD of the left and right kidney (52.8 ± 13.4 vs 51.07 ± 12. 65 ml per minute, respectively) and total GFRs were in wide range from 78 to 155 ml per minute.
Conclusions: Tc99m-DTPA renoscintigraphy quantitative parameters in the healthy people could be used as reference to
research and clinical practice.

Article Details

References

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. Alain Prigent (2008). Monitoring renal function and limitations of renal function tests. Semin Nucl Med 38: 32 – 46.
2. Andrew Taylor, David M. Schuster, Naomi Alazraki (2000). The Genitourinary System. A Clinician’s Guide to Nuclear Medicine. pp45 – 76.
3. El Maghraby TA, Van Eck-Smit BL, De Fijter JW, Pauwels EK (1998). Quantitative scintigraphic parameters for the assessment of renal transplant
patients. Eur J Radiol.;28(3):256-69.
4. F. Artunc, S. Yildiz, C. Rossi et al (2006). Simultaneous evaluation of renal morphology and function in live kidney donors using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Transplant Proc; 71(5):1187-92.
5. Grassi G, Abdelkawy H, Barsotti M, Paleologo G, Tregnaghi C et al (2009). Living kidney transplantation: evaluation of renal function and morphology of potential
donors. Transplant Proc; 41(4):1121-4.
6. Itoh K (2003). Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method and plasma sample method. Ann Nucl Med. ;17(7):561-5.
7. O’Malley JP, Ziessman HA (1993). Quantitatio6n of renal function using radioisotopic techniques. Clin Lab Med.;13(1):53-68.
8. Shokeir AA, Gad HM, el-Diasty (2003). Role of radioisotope renal scan in the choice of nephrectomy side in live kidney donors. J Urol ; 170 :373-6.
9. White CA, Huang D, Akbari A, Garland J, Knoll GA (2008). Performance of creatinine-based estimates of GFR in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic
review. J Kidney Dis ;51(6):1005-15.