The imaging characteristics and embolization treatment of spinal arteriovenous

Nguyen Tat Thien1, Vu Dang Luu2, Nguyen Quang Anh2, Tran Anh Tuan3, Pham Minh Thong4,
1 Resident Doctor of Medical University Hanoi
2 Department of Diagnostic Imaging photo of Hanoi Medical University
3 Hospital Bach Mai
4 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

SUMMARY


Purpose: to describe the imaging characteristics and the results of spinal arteriovenous shunt treated by endovascular
intervention.
Material and Methods: Descriptive and intervention study, patients were diagnosed and treated by endovascular intervention
at the Bach Mai hospital from 2012 to 2016. Imaging features were evaluated on MRI and DSA, evaluated of effectiveness of treatment based on the comparison of clinical symtoms, MRI imaging before and after endovascular treatment.
Result: Diagnosis and endovascular intervention of 20 patients. On MRI, the sign of spinal cord edema and dilated venous drainage were spotted in almost patients. The rate of complete angiographic obliteration was 60% patients and partial in 45.5% patients. After follow up of 3-6 months, spinal cord
damage reduce accounted 88.23% and 11.77% patients remain unchanged, clinically significance improvement was achieved in
82.35% patients,17.65% patients do not improve (3 cases are continous following).
Conclusion: MRI plays an important role in the diagnosis and follow up patients with spinal arteriovenous shunt, DSA is the gold standard for diagnosis and to allow intervention treatment with high effective.

Article Details

References

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. Aminoff, M.J. and V. Logue, The prognosis of patients with spinal vascular malformations. Brain, 1974. 97(1): p. 211-8.
2. Berenstein, A., P. Lajaunias, and K.G.t. Brugge, Spinal Arteriovenous Malformations, in Surgical Neuroangiography. 2004, Springer. p. 738-872.
3. Saraf-Lavi, E., et al., Detection of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae with MR imaging and contrast-enhanced MR angiography: sensitivity, specificity, and prediction of vertebral level. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002. 23(5): p. 858-67.
4. Niimi, Y., et al., Symptoms,Vascular anatomy and endovascular treatment of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations. Interv Neuroradiol, 2000. 6 Suppl 1: p. 199-202.
5. Cho, W.S., et al., Clinical features and treatment outcomes of the spinal arteriovenous fistulas and malformations. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013. 19 (2): p. 207-16.
6. Rodesch, G. and P. Lasjaunias, Spinal cord arteriovenous shunts: from imaging to management. Eur J Radiol, 2003. 46 (3): p. 221-32.
7. Park SB, Han MH, Jahng TA, Kwon BJ, and Chung CK. Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Clinical Experience with Endovascular Treatment as a Primary Therapeutic Modality. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008; 44 (6): 364-369
8. Rosenblum B, Oldfield EH, et al. Spinal arteriovenous malformations: a comparison of dural arteriovenous fistulas and intradural AVM’s in 81 patients. J Neurosurg. 1987;67:795-802.