Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 11/07/2022
Online Published: 11/07/2022
Abstract Views: 94
Views PDF: 54
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.28.482.2017
Issue
No. 28 (2017)
Section
Scientific research
How to Cite
Phan, H. G., Nguyen, X. H., Nguyen, T. B. N., Le, V. K., & Do, H. H. (2022). Evaluating the result of changing semen analysis When treating of varicocele endovascular intervention using the sandwich technique at bach mai hospital. Vietnamese Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 28, 46-51. https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.28.482.2017

Evaluating the result of changing semen analysis When treating of varicocele endovascular intervention using the sandwich technique at bach mai hospital

Phan Hoang Giang1, Nguyen Xuan Hien1, Nguyen Thi Bich Ngoc2, Le Van Khanh1, Do Huy Hoang3,
1 Doctor of Diagnostic Imaging Department, Bach Mai Hospital
2 Doctor of medical examination, Bach Mai hospital
3 Resident Doctor of Radiology, Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

SUMMARY


Purpose: Evaluating the result of changing semen analysis when treating varicocele endovascular intervention by sandwich technique combining Coils and glue (histocryl).
Methods and objectives: 78 patients were diagnosed and treated successfully at Bach Mai hospital from 5/2009 to 5/2017, they were examined, performed semen analysis and
ultrasound at before and after 6 months of embolization.
Result: The average age of 22.6 years old, the
hospitalized reasons is mainly scrotal pain, with 76.9%. After 6 months of treatment, all patients have pain reduction, the pain scores decreased from 6.7 points to 1.2, p < 0.05. Increasing sperm concentration from 10 million/ml to 21 million/ml, sperm
mobility increased from 27% to 55%, p <0.05. Spermatic vein diameter returns to normal limits and have no reflux line after 6 months. No major or minor complications during the
intervention and 6 months after intervention
Conclusion: Embolization of spermatic vein with technique sandwich combined Coils and glue to treat varicocele is safe and high effective on improving semen’s quality and quantity.

Article Details

Keywords

Varicocele, semen analysis, varicocele, endovascular intervention, sandwich technique

References

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. Berger OG, Varicocele in adolescence. ClinPediatr (Phila), 1998. 19:(810-811).
2. Andres TE, Trainer TD and Lapenas DJ (1981) Small vessel alteration intestis of infertile men with varicocele. Am J Clin Pathol 76,378 – 384.
3. Cameron DT and Snydle FE (1982) Ultrastructural surface characteristics of seminiferous tubules from men with varicocele. Andrologia 14,425 – 433.
4. Kurgan A, Nunnelee J., Zilberman M. (1994) The importance of the early detection of varicocele in adolescent males. 1994. 19: p. 36-37.
5. Homonnai ZT, Engelhard Y, Rudberg Z, David MP, Paz G (1997) Varicocelectomy and male fertility: comparison of semen quality and recurrence of varicocele following varicocelectomy by two techniques. Int J Androl 1997. 3: p. 447-458.
6. Roberto Gandini and et al (2008), Transcatheter foam sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate--outcome
in 244 patients. Radiology, 2008. 246: p. 2.
7. Kian-Hiong Tay and et al (2002) Selective Spermatic Venography and Varicocele Embolization in Men with
Circumaotic Left Renal Veins. Journal vascular interventional radiology 2002. 13: p. 739-742.
8. Comhaire F and Vermeulen A (1975) Plasma testosterone in patients with varicocele and sexual inadequacy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 40,824 – 829.
9. Puche-Sanz and et al (2014). Primary treatment of painful varicocoele through percutaneous retrograde embolization with fibred Coilss. Andrology, 2014. 2: p. 716-720.