Research Value of Strain Elastography (Semi-quantitative) in Breast Tumor Diagnosis.

Dr Jasmine Thanh Xuan1, Dr Phan Thanh Hai1
1 Ho Chi Minh City Medic Center

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Combined B-mode ultrasound and Strain Elastography Imaging (Semi-quantitative) which calculates the cutoff
value of Strain Elastography in diagnosis of benign /malignant breast tumor.
Method: Patients with breast tumors were combined B-mode breast ultrasound, using the WS80A equipment (Samsung), and
Strain Elastography (Semi-quantitative), followed by Tsukuba-score and Ratio (B/A) (A= tumor lesion, B = fatty tissue above the lesion). From that, evaluated the accuracy, specificity, positive predictive value, accuracy and cut-off values of the Strain Elastography for diagnosis of benign/malignant breast tumors.
Results: 93 women with breast tumors (67 benign tumors, 26 breast cancers), diagnosed by cytology and histopathology. The
average rate of semi-quantitative in malignant and benign tumors compared to fat tissue respectively was (4.73 +/- 2.45) and (1.85 +/- 0.92). The area under the ROC curve is 0.92. The cut-off value was (2.43) has the highest sensitivity (88.5%) and the specificity (82.1%) in the diagnosis of malignant tumors. Positive predictive value (92.8%), accuracy (82.3%).
Conclusion: Using Strain Elastography to measure the elasticity ratio of the breast tumor compared to fat tissue, with a cutoff
values (2.43), with high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of benign /malignant breast tumor, which complements the breast Birads categories classification.

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Thiện Hùng (2015). “Siêu âm đàn hồi và ứng dụng lâm sàng” https://www.slideshare. net/hungnguyenthien/siu-m-n-hi-v-ng-dng-lmsng- 45375546
2. Ueno &al.(2007).” New Quantitative Method in Breast Elastography: Fat Lesion Ratio (FLR)”. Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007, Chicago.
3. Richard G. Barr (2017). “Elastography: a practical approach”. First edition. New York: Thieme.
4. Wfumb guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 2: breast- Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 1148– 1160, 2015