Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 08/07/2022
Online Published: 08/07/2022
Abstract Views: 88
Views PDF: 117
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.36.597.2019
Issue
No. 36 (2019)
Section
Scientific research
How to Cite
Le, M. N., Cao, T. H. Y., Vu, D. L., Nguyen, X. H., & Pham, M. T. (2022). ĐÁNH GIÁ HIỆU QUẢ ĐIỀU TRỊ TRUNG HẠN SUY TĨNH MẠCH MẠN TÍNH BẰNG PHƯƠNG PHÁP CAN THIỆP NỘI MẠCH. Vietnamese Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 36, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.55046/vjrnm.36.597.2019

ĐÁNH GIÁ HIỆU QUẢ ĐIỀU TRỊ TRUNG HẠN SUY TĨNH MẠCH MẠN TÍNH BẰNG PHƯƠNG PHÁP CAN THIỆP NỘI MẠCH

Dr le Minh Nguyet1, Dr Cao Thi Hong Yen1, Dr Vu Dang Luu1, Dr Nguyen Xuan Hien1, professor Pham Minh Thong1
1 Radiology Center - Bach Mai Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this work was to evaluate the outcomes after the endovascular interventions for chronic venous insufficiency of the lower limbs.
Methods: This study was conducted on 60 patients diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency of the lower limbs at the Radiology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, 2018 – 2019. Convenience sampling technique was used for this study.
Results: Endovenous laser ablation was indicated for 40 patients and endovenous radiofrequency (RF) ablation was for 20 patients, showing all patients were removed from the reflux line. For the patients with laser ablation, the mean Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) were 3,67 ± 3,58 (0-11) before the treatment; 1,22 ± 2,03 (0-6) at 1 month; and 0,41 ± 1,01 (0-4) at 12
months. For the patients with RF ablation, the mean VCSS were 3,62 ± 3,45 (0-10) before the treatment; 0,15 ± 0,55 (0-2) at 1 month; and 0,08 ± 0,28 (0-1) at 12 months. 18 cases were recorded the complications after the intervention
(30.00%), including dark skin, and paresthesia. 2 cases had the positions with varicose veins after 12 months (3.33%). There were no significant differences in the efficacy and complications amongst endovenous laser ablation and endovenous radiofrequency ablation (p >0.05).

Article Details

References

1. Kutas, B., et al., Does the direction of tumescent solution delivery matter in endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein? Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis, 2015. 9(6): p. 397-402.
2. Gibson, K., et al., American College of Phlebology Guidelines - Treatment of refluxing accessory saphenous veins. Phlebology, 2016.
3. Sydnor, M., et al., A randomized prospective long-term (>1 year) clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation to 980 nm laser ablation of the great saphenous vein. Phlebology, 2016.
4. Wozniak, W., R.K. Mlosek, and P. Ciostek, Complications and Failure of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation Procedures in Patients With Lower Extremity Varicose Veins in a 5-Year Follow-Up. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2016. 50(7): p. 475-483.
5. Shoab, S.S., D. Lowry, and A. Tiwari, Effect of treated length in endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous vein on early outcomes. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2016. 4(4): p. 416-21.
6. Go, S.J., et al., Study on the Long-Term Results of Endovenous Laser Ablation for Treating Varicose Veins. Int J Angiol, 2016. 25(2): p. 117-20.