Study new reconstruction algorithm to decrease the dose of chest computed tomography
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: To Investigate extent of radiation dose reduction in chest CT scaner using an Iterative Reconstruction Technique.
Methods: Image quality and radiation dose (dose length product and CT dose index, effective dose) were restrospectively
reviewed in 60 CT examination of 60 patients who were underwent the lung screening. Standard Dose CT (SDCT) group considered as control were performed at 100kV and 120 mAs of reference; Low dose CT (LDCT) group were done at 100kV and 50 mAs of reference. We apply the technique of automatic mA modulation – CAREdoseTM in both group. The filtered back projection was applied for SDCT, the itirative reconstruction algorithm was used for LDCT.
Results: Compare whith SDCT, LDCT have the radiation exposure reduction with CTDIvol = 1.69 ± 0.56 mGy (decrease
60%), DLP = 54.67 ± 15.99 mGy.cm (decrease 65%), Effective dose = 0.76 ± 0.22mSv (decrease 65%), (p < 0.001). There was
no the difference in quality image between 2 groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:The low-dose CT protocol yields a significant reduction in radiation exposure while maintaining the quality
image, safety and precision. Iritative reconstruction plays an important role to improve the quality image.
Article Details
References
2. Chang D. H et al (2015), “Radiation Dose Reduction in Computed TomographyGuidedLung Interventions using an IterativeReconstruction
Technique”, Interventional Radiology,pp. 906-914.
3. European guideline on quality criteria for computed tomography, chest high resolution CT, pp. 22
4. Fintelmann, MD et al (2015), “The 10 Pillars of Lung Cancer Screening: Rationale and Logistics of a Lung Cancer Screening Program”, radiographics.rsna. org,pp. 1893-1908.
5. Fontarensky et al (2015), “Reduced radiation Dose with Model-based iterative reconstruction versus standard Dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT for Diagnosis of acute renal colic”, Genitourinary Imaging, pp. 1-11
6. Mayo et al (2003), “Radiation Exposure at Chest CT: A Statement of the Fleischner Society”, Radiology 2003, pp. 15-21.
7. Martinsen et al (2010), “Improved image quality of low-dose thoracic CT examinations with a new postprocessing software”, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, vol 11.
8. McCollough et al (2015), “Degradation of cT lowcontrast spatial resolution Due to the Use of iterative reconstruction and reduced Dose levels”, Medical Physics.
9. Nevzat et al (2002), “Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose helical CT in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules”, European Radiol, pp. 2764-2769.
10. The Committee for Management of CTscreening- detected Pulmonary Nodules (2011), “Low-dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines for
Pulmonary Nodules Management”.