The value of dynamic subtraction MRI 3.0 Tesla technique in the angiogenesis assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

HUY VŨ TRỌNG1,, Pham Minh Thong
1 Trung tâm y tế huyện Việt Yên

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: The value of dynamic subtraction MRI 3.0 Tesla technique in the angiogenesis assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.


Methods:  A cross-sectional, retrospective descriptive study was performed on 40 patients, who had been diagnosed with HCC and treated with TACE, then do dynamic subtraction MRI 3T from 6/2021 to 6/2022 at Bach Mai hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.


Result: The study consisted of 43 patients with 55 hepatocellular carcinoma lesions who underwent transarterial chemoembolization procedure and followed up by dynamic MRI of the liver with post processing to obtain subtraction images and compared with DSA. The subtraction images have sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 100%. On the other hand, the dynamic images is 90,9%; 69,2%; 90,9%;69,2%; the Diffusion images is 97,7%; 61,5%; 89,6%; 88,9%. Comparative study between D-MRI and DS-MRI assessments revealed; highly significant increase in disease detection rate, sensitivity, and NPV in favor of DS-MRI in HCC patients; with highly significant difference (p < 0.01 respectively).


Conclusions: Dynamic MRI is valuable in the angiogenesis assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma after TACE, however, this value is augmented by the addition of subtraction technique especially in lesions having high signal before administration of contrast medium with sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 100%. So we recommend adding the subtraction technique in the protocol of MRI in the follow up after transarterial chemoembolization as it increases the diagnostic confidence.

Article Details

References

1. Asafo-Agyei KO, Samant H. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. [Updated 2022 Jun 21]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-.
2. QĐ 3129-Bộ Y tế. Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị ung thư biểu mô tế bào gan; 2020.
3. Kudo M, Kubo S, Takayasu K, Sakamoto M, Tanaka M, Ikai I, Furuse J, Nakamura K, Makuuchi M; Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (Committee for Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver, Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan). Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2009 Revised Version). Hepatol Res. 2010 Jul;40(7):686-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1872034X.2010.00674.x. PMID: 20633194.
4. Bosch F.X, Ribes J, Diaz M et al (2004). Primary liver cancer:worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology, 127(5), 5-16. .
5. Jelic S, Sotiropoulos G.C (2010). Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMOnClinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology, 21 (5), 59-64.
6. Huỳnh Quang Huy, Phạm Minh Thông, Đào Văn Long. Nghiên cứu vai trò cộng hưởng từ trong chẩn đoán và đánh giá ung thư biểu mô tế bào gan bằng phương pháp nút mạch hóa dầu. (2015).
7. Metwally LIA, Mahmoud BE, Yehia M (2019). The value of dynamic subtraction MRI technique in the assessment of treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 50(1)
8. ElSaid NAE, Kaddah RO, Fattah MSA, Salama NM (2016). Subtraction MRI versus diffusion weighted imaging: Which is more accurate in assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma after Trans Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE)? The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 47(4):1251-1264.
9. Hassan MG, Abdelrahman AS, Abdu EMH (2020). Role of Dynamic Subtraction MRI in Assessment of Reactivity of Hepatic Focal Lesions post Trance arterial chemoembolization. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 113(Supplement_1)
10. Medhat M. Reffat, Wael Elshawaf, Shorouk Z. Abdel Shafy, Khaled E. Aly. The Role of Dynamic Subtraction MRI in assessment of reactivity of HFLs post TACE by 3 tesla MRI machine. BMFJ 2021;38(1): 344-352 DOI: 10.21608/ bmfj.2021.50243.1345.