Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 417
Study of hepatic vascular anatomy with multidetector computed tomography
Main Article Content
Abstract
SUMMARY
Aims: To identify the prevalence of normal anatomy and vascular variants of hepatic vessels by using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 611 adults who, for different reasons, came to university medical center Hochiminh city, all underwent abdominal MDCT with contrast material. From the data stored in PACS, using image processing applications (MPR, CPR, MIP, VR) to investigate anatomy of the hepatic artery, the portal vein and the hepatic vein systems.
Results: From 08/2017 to 08/2018 at University Medical Center, HCMC, a total of 564 of the 611 patients had the common hepatic artery originated the celiac axis, anatomic variations were seen in 7.7% of patients. 9 of 10 anatomic types (criteria laid by Michels ‘s classification) were identified in our study, type 1 (the typical type) seen in 73.6% cases, we also found 5 other types of the hepatic artery not mentioned in Michels classification (3.1%). Normal anatomy of portal vein was identified in 84.1% of cases. Trifurcation - the most popular type of portal vein variants was seen in 11.3% of patients. The common trunk between the left hepatic vein and the median hepatic vein was seen in 58.6% cases. The accessory right hepatic veins were identified in 45.5% of the patients. There were not correlation between kinds of hepatic vascular variants (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Hepatic vascular anatomy plays an important role in hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectommy and living liver transplantation. Because of high prevalence of vascular variants, knowledge of these abnormalities and their frequency is of major importance for the surgeon as well as the radiologist.
Article Details
References
1 Atasoy, Ç. & Özyürek, E. J. A. J. o. R. Prevalence and types of main and right portal vein branching variations on MDCT. 187, 676-681 (2006).
2 Erbay, N., Raptopoulos, V., Pomfret, E. A., Kamel, I. R. & Kruskal, J. B. J. A. J. o. R. Living donor liver transplantation in adults: vascular variants important in surgical planning for donors and recipients. 181, 109- 114 (2003).
3 Favelier, S. et al. Anatomy of liver arteries for interventional radiology. 96, 537-546 (2015).
4 Heilmaier, C. et al. Mapping of hepatic vascular anatomy: dynamic contrast-enhanced parallel MR imaging compared with 64–detector row CT. 245, 872-880 (2007).
5 Tanikake, M. et al. Three-dimensional CT angiography of the hepatic artery: use of multi–detector row helical CT and a contrast agent. 227, 883-889 (2003).
6 Lawton, J. et al. Computer-assisted study of the axial orientation and distances between renovisceral arteries ostia. 39, 149-160 (2017).
7 Araujo Neto, S. A. et al. Multidetector computed tomography angiography of the celiac trunk and hepatic arterial system: normal anatomy and main variants. 49, 49-52 (2016).
8 Osman, A. M., Abdrabou, A. J. T. E. J. o. R. & Medicine, N. Celiac trunk and hepatic artery variants: A retrospective preliminary MSCT report among Egyptian patients. 47, 1451-1458 (2016).
9 Cường, L. V. Các dạng và kích thước động mạch ở người Việt Nam. tr. 102-148 (Nhà xuất bản Y học TP. HCM, 2012).
10 Trần Sinh Vương. Nghiên cứu về nguyên ủy, các dạng phân nhánh của động mạch gan ở người Việt Nam trưởng thành. Tạp chí Y học thực hành 817, tr. 73-75 (2012).
11 Song, S.-Y. et al. Celiac axis and common hepatic artery variations in 5002 patients: systematic analysis with spiral CT and DSA. 255, 278-288 (2010).
12 Sureka, B. et al. Variations of celiac axis, common hepatic artery and its branches in 600 patients. 23, 223 (2013).
13 Hiatt, J. R., Gabbay, J. & Busuttil, R. W. J. A. o. s. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. 220, 50 (1994).
14 Koops, A. et al. Anatomic variations of the hepatic arteries in 604 selective celiac and superior mesenteric angiographies. 26, 239-244 (2004).
15 Thangarajah, A., Parthasarathy, R. J. J. o. c. & JCDR, d. r. Celiac axis, common hepatic and hepatic artery variants as evidenced on MDCT angiography in south indian population. 10, TC01 (2016).
16 Madoff, D. C. et al. Transhepatic portal vein embolization: anatomy, indications, and technical considerations. 22, 1063-1076 (2002).
17 Atri, M., Bret, P. & Fraser-Hill, M. J. R. Intrahepatic portal venous variations: prevalence with US. 184, 157-158 (1992).
18 Fraser-Hill, M. et al. Intrahepatic portal venous system: variations demonstrated with duplex and color Doppler US. 177, 523-526 (1990).
19 Lee, W.-K. et al. Imaging assessment of congenital and acquired abnormalities of the portal venous system. 31, 905-926 (2011).
20 Covey, A. M., Brody, L. A., Getrajdman, G. I., Sofocleous, C. T. & Brown, K. T. J. A. J. o. R. Incidence, patterns, and clinical relevance of variant portal vein anatomy. 183, 1055-1064 (2004).
21 Lee, V. S. et al. MR imaging as the sole preoperative imaging modality for right hepatectomy: a prospective study of living adult-to-adult liver donor candidates. 176, 1475-1482 (2001).
22 Stemmler, B. J. et al. Dual-phase 3D MDCT angiography for evaluation of the liver before hepatic resection. 183, 1551-1557 (2004).
23 Chaib, E., Ribeiro Jr, M., Saad, W. A. & Gama-Rodrigues, J. in Transplantation proceedings. 1063-1066
(Elsevier).